Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Trending
    • Tesla and SpaceX: Why does Elon Musk want to merge the companies?
    • British Columbia Is Giving Away Public Land Behind Closed Doors
    • No. 6 Kellam Stuns Top-Ranked Ocean Lakes in Girls Volleyball
    • Man in court over alleged ‘targeted’ attack on Australian lawmaker
    • Elon Musk says SpaceX and Tesla exploring largest merger in history | Business and Economy
    • Texas QB Arch Manning has self-diagnosed his issue, and it makes sense
    • Contributor: Prevent collateral damage from California’s new gold rush
    • ‘High percentage’ of DOJ’s California noncitizen voters list born in US, preliminary LA County analysis shows
    Prime US News
    • Home
    • World News
    • Latest News
    • US News
    • Sports
    • Politics
    • Opinions
    • More
      • Tech News
      • Trending News
      • World Economy
    Prime US News
    Home»Latest News»Portugal’s parliament approves far-right party’s bill to ban face veils | Government News
    Latest News

    Portugal’s parliament approves far-right party’s bill to ban face veils | Government News

    Team_Prime US NewsBy Team_Prime US NewsOctober 17, 2025No Comments3 Mins Read
    Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Reddit Telegram Email
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email


    If invoice is signed into legislation, Portugal would be part of a number of European international locations which have already got full or partial bans.

    Printed On 17 Oct 202517 Oct 2025

    Share

    Portugal has authorized a invoice to ban face veils used for “gender or non secular motives” in most public areas that was proposed by the far-right Chega get together and targets burqas and niqabs worn by Muslim girls.

    Below the invoice, authorized by parliament on Friday, proposed fines for carrying face veils in public would vary from 200 to 4,000 euros ($234-$4,670). Forcing somebody to put on one could be punishable with jail phrases of as much as three years.

    Beneficial Tales

    checklist of three gadgetsfinish of checklist

    Face veils would nonetheless be allowed in aeroplanes, diplomatic premises and locations of worship.

    In line with native media reviews, the invoice is now set to be mentioned within the parliamentary committee on Constitutional Affairs, Rights, Freedoms, and Ensures – a physique liable for reviewing laws associated to constitutional issues.

    If signed into legislation, it might put Portugal alongside European international locations, together with France, Austria, Belgium and the Netherlands, which have already got full or partial bans.

    President Marcelo Rebelo de Sousa might nonetheless veto the invoice or ship it to the Constitutional Court docket for checks.

    Throughout Friday’s parliamentary session, Chega chief Andre Ventura was confronted by a number of feminine lawmakers from left-wing events who opposed the invoice, nevertheless it handed with help from the centre-right coalition.

    “We’re at present defending feminine members of parliament, your daughters, our daughters, from having to make use of burqas on this nation someday,” Ventura mentioned.

    In a put up on X, he wrote: “Right now is a historic day for our democracy and for the safeguarding of our values, our id and ladies’s rights.”

    Andreia Neto, a lawmaker from the ruling Social Democratic Occasion, mentioned earlier than the vote: “It is a debate on equality between women and men. No lady must be compelled to veil her face.”

    Two out of the ten events in parliament abstained from the vote – the Folks-Animals-Nature get together, and the Collectively for the Folks get together, in accordance with native media reviews.

    The events have prompt that the proposal incited discrimination.

    Solely a small minority of Muslim girls in Europe cowl their faces, and in Portugal such veils are very uncommon.

    However full-face coverings corresponding to niqabs and burqas have develop into a polarising situation throughout Europe, with some arguing that they symbolise gender discrimination or can signify a safety menace and must be outlawed.



    Source link

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Previous ArticleRodgers sends message to Steelers after disappointing loss
    Next Article Pakistan, Afghanistan extend ceasefire as Doha talks set to begin
    Team_Prime US News
    • Website

    Related Posts

    Latest News

    Elon Musk says SpaceX and Tesla exploring largest merger in history | Business and Economy

    October 21, 2026
    Latest News

    Why former FDLR fighters are returning to Rwanda | News

    October 21, 2026
    Latest News

    Trump commits more than $400m ahead of high-stakes midterm elections | US Midterm Elections 2026 News

    October 20, 2026
    Add A Comment
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Most Popular

    Trump orders new signs outside Smithsonian saying some exhibits are inaccurate

    July 26, 2026

    Pirro ON FIRE as She Announces New Charges Against Two More Teens Who Attacked Edward Coristine, AKA “Big Balls” (VIDEO) | The Gateway Pundit

    October 20, 2025

    Asia Pacific faces weaker growth and higher inflation from Middle East crisis, ADB warns

    April 10, 2026
    Our Picks

    Tesla and SpaceX: Why does Elon Musk want to merge the companies?

    October 21, 2026

    British Columbia Is Giving Away Public Land Behind Closed Doors

    October 21, 2026

    No. 6 Kellam Stuns Top-Ranked Ocean Lakes in Girls Volleyball

    October 21, 2026
    Categories
    • Latest News
    • Opinions
    • Politics
    • Sports
    • Tech News
    • Trending News
    • US News
    • World Economy
    • World News
    • Privacy Policy
    • Disclaimer
    • Terms and Conditions
    • About us
    • Contact us
    Copyright © 2024 Primeusnews.com All Rights Reserved.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.