Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Trending
    • Liverpool player Diogo Jota dies in tragic accident at 28
    • Contributor: A refresher course in American truths
    • A strike by air traffic controllers is disrupting travel to, from and over France
    • What will come out of the Fed’s latest internal review?
    • MORE WINNING: Watch CNN Report on the ‘Better Than Expected’ June Jobs Report (VIDEO) | The Gateway Pundit
    • Second day of travel chaos as French air traffic controllers strike
    • US and Colombia recall envoys as diplomatic rift deepens | News
    • Novak Djokovic is embracing role as an old-timer at Wimbledon
    Prime US News
    • Home
    • World News
    • Latest News
    • US News
    • Sports
    • Politics
    • Opinions
    • More
      • Tech News
      • Trending News
      • World Economy
    Prime US News
    Home»US News»A week of shifting descriptions of Iran attack spark ongoing questions about extent of damage and goals
    US News

    A week of shifting descriptions of Iran attack spark ongoing questions about extent of damage and goals

    Team_Prime US NewsBy Team_Prime US NewsJune 28, 2025No Comments7 Mins Read
    Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Reddit Telegram Email
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email


    Every week after President Donald Trump ordered a U.S. attack on three Iranian nuclear sites, the reasons and descriptions of what occurred voiced by him, high aides and early intelligence studies paint contrasting photos of the extent of the harm to Iran’s nuclear program.

    Whereas the president and Protection Secretary Pete Hegseth repeatedly claimed that Iran’s nuclear program has been “obliterated,” preliminary assessments — together with from the Pentagon’s personal intelligence wing — painted an evolving image because the week went on.

    President Donald Trump departs after talking throughout “One, Huge, Lovely Occasion” within the East Room of the White Home in Washington, D.C., on June 26, 2025.

    Brendan Smialowski/AFP through Getty Photographs

    Trump stated he ordered the assault on June 21 to strike a uranium enrichment website positioned in 300 toes deep in a mountain in Fordo in northwestern Iran, an uranium enrichment website in Natanz and the Isfahan Nuclear Expertise Middle following studies that Iranian officers didn’t adjust to worldwide nuclear laws.

    And as these early harm assessments forged doubt on the extent to which Iran nuclear program was crippled, a number of of Trump’s high aides and allied lawmakers additionally appeared to reduce the acknowledged targets of the assault.

    Listed here are a number of the accounts and characterizations during the last week.

    Officers label mission a hit, however present few particulars to start out

    On Sunday morning, Protection Secretary Pete Hegseth echoed Trump’s assertion from Saturday evening, simply after the strikes, that the websites had been “obliterated.”

    “It was clear we devastated the Iranian nuclear program,” he added.

    Joint Chiefs Chairman Gen. Dan Caine, nonetheless, declined to go as far, saying it could take extra time to evaluate the extent of the harm achieved.

    Hegseth acknowledged that harm evaluation was ongoing however caught by the outline he and Trump had been utilizing.

    “All of our precision munitions struck the place we needed them to strike and had the specified impact, which suggests particularly the first goal right here, we consider we achieved destruction of capabilities there,” he stated.

    Secretary of Protection Pete Hegseth throughout a Medal of Honor ceremony for World Battle II Military Ranger veterans within the Capitol in Washington, June 26, 2025.

    Aaron Schwartz/EPA/Shutterstock

    Pentagon preliminary harm report leaks

    Officers and inspectors from exterior Iran haven’t been in a position to acquire direct entry to the bombed websites to make a first-hand evaluation.

    Trump officers had a extra nuanced take after information studies surfaced Tuesday about an preliminary Protection Intelligence Company evaluation that stated the assault set again Iran’s nuclear program solely by months.

    On Wednesday, Secretary of State Marco Rubio condemned the leaks of the navy’s report however didn’t go so far as to assert that the websites had been obliterated.

    As an alternative, he insisted that “very important, substantial harm was achieved” to key elements of Iran’s nuclear program, “and we’re simply studying extra about it.”

    On the identical time, Rubio supplied extra particulars concerning the assault, together with that the bunker-buster bombs had been dropped on air flow shafts main deep inside Fordo’s closely fortified facility — buried, officers and specialists stated, 200 to 300 toes inside a mountain.

    He finally acknowledged that it was troublesome to get a learn on harm inflicted to Fordo at this level, however asserted “the underside line is actual harm was achieved.”

    That very same day, Director of Nationwide Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard claimed in an announcement that the three services had been destroyed.

    The director common of the U.N.’s nuclear oversight company, the Worldwide Atomic Power Company, Rafael Grossi, stated Wednesday that he believed a few of Iran’s enriched uranium had been moved from the websites earlier than the assaults.

    Trump refuted that evaluation.

    Secretary of State Marco Rubio attends an occasion to advertise President Donald Trump’s home coverage and finances agenda within the East Room of the White Home, on June 26, 2025, in Washington, D.C.

    Mark Schiefelbein/AP

    “It could have taken two weeks, perhaps. But it surely’s very exhausting to take away that form of materials, very exhausting and really harmful. Plus, they knew we had been coming, and in the event that they know we’re coming, they don’t seem to be going to be down there,” he stated Wednesday.

    Trump reiterated that the websites and the uranium had been buried underneath rubble and inaccessible, including that vans seen in satellite tv for pc photos on the plant earlier than the assault — which some speculated might have been used to maneuver the nuclear materials — had been building automobiles getting used to cowl the air flow shaft openings with protecting concrete.

    In accordance with the 2 folks accustomed to the DIA’s categorized report, the bombing sealed off the entrances to 2 of the three nuclear websites focused within the assault however a lot of the harm was achieved to constructions above floor, leaving the decrease constructions intact.

    The evaluation additionally discovered that no less than some enriched uranium remained – presumably moved from the nuclear websites forward of the blasts.

    The following day, on Thursday, Hegseth held a information convention the place he slammed the information media over reporting however didn’t make the identical evaluation on the nuclear supplies.

    Requested twice throughout the briefing if he might be extra definitive about whether or not the enriched uranium was moved earlier than the assault, Hegseth stated the Pentagon was “watching each side.”

    PHOTO: Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Air Force Gen. Dan Caine turns to watch a video of a bombing test of the GBU-57A/B Massive Ordnance Penetrator during a news conference at the Pentagon, June 26, 2025, in Arlington, Virginia.

    Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Workers Air Drive Gen. Dan Caine turns to observe a video of a bombing take a look at of the GBU-57A/B Large Ordnance Penetrator used within the assault on the Iranian Fordow Gas Enrichment Plant throughout a information convention on the Pentagon, June 26, 2025, in Arlington, Virginia.

    Andrew Harnik/Getty Photographs

    At that very same Thursday briefing, Caine famous it’s not his job to evaluate the harm, saying, “We don’t grade our personal homework.”

    Facility destruction downplayed by officers, ceasefire emphasised

    Hegseth additionally highlighted what gave the impression to be a distinct aim of the mission, arguing the assault had succeeded as a result of it led to stopping the combating between Iran and Israel — reasonably than the services’ destruction as a result of it destroyed Iran’s nuclear program.

    “We bought that peace, that ceasefire, that possibility due to power, due to [Trump’s] willingness to make use of American navy may that nobody else on the planet can do with the form of planners and operators that the chairman simply laid out,” he stated.

    Then, on Friday, Trump echoed that sentiment.

    “They put out that fireside as soon as that occurred, as soon as these bombs bought dropped out, that conflict was over,” he stated.

    Nonetheless, the president claimed once more that the websites had been obliterated throughout a information convention.

    “We completed them off,” he stated, including, “I do not consider that they are going to return into nuclear anytime quickly.”

    President Donald Trump speaks throughout a gathering with Democratic Republic of the Congo’s Overseas Minister Therese Kayikwamba Wagner and Rwanda’s Overseas Minister Olivier Nduhungirehe within the Oval Workplace on the White Home in Washington, June 27, 2025.

    Andrew Caballero-reynolds/AFP through Getty Photographs

    Abbas Araghchi, the Iranian overseas minister stated on Iranian State TV Thursday, nonetheless, the services weren’t destroyed and his nation may have leverage in negotiations.

    The destiny of the enriched uranium

    On Capitol Hill on Thursday, after administration officers gave lawmakers a categorized briefing on the strikes, Republican lawmakers acknowledged that the U.S. strikes might not have destroyed Iran’s cache of enriched uranium. However they stated that wasn’t a part of the mission.

    “The aim of the mission was to get rid of sure specific elements of their nuclear program. These had been eradicated. To eliminate the nuclear materials was not a part of the mission,” Rep. Greg Murphy, R-N.C., advised CNN.

    Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., stated the “program was obliterated at these three websites,” however added, “I do not know the place the 900 kilos of extremely enriched uranium exists. But it surely wasn’t a part of the targets there.”



    Source link

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Previous ArticleWWI & The Lusitania | Armstrong Economics
    Next Article Maple Leafs in negotiations for Mitch Marner sign-and-trade
    Team_Prime US News
    • Website

    Related Posts

    US News

    A strike by air traffic controllers is disrupting travel to, from and over France

    July 4, 2025
    US News

    Over 100 firefighters battle California fireworks blaze that leaves woman in critical condition

    July 4, 2025
    US News

    175+ Democrats supporting NAACP suit against dismantling Department of Education

    July 4, 2025
    Add A Comment
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Most Popular

    Clippers’ Kawhi Leonard expected to make season debut vs. Hawks

    January 4, 2025

    Disgraced Ex-FBI Official Andrew McCabe Says FBI in “Utter Disarray” and Agents are Living in Fear as They Await Next Trump Purge (VIDEO) | The Gateway Pundit

    February 4, 2025

    Malaysia to crack down on Nvidia chip flows under US pressure

    March 24, 2025
    Our Picks

    Liverpool player Diogo Jota dies in tragic accident at 28

    July 4, 2025

    Contributor: A refresher course in American truths

    July 4, 2025

    A strike by air traffic controllers is disrupting travel to, from and over France

    July 4, 2025
    Categories
    • Latest News
    • Opinions
    • Politics
    • Sports
    • Tech News
    • Trending News
    • US News
    • World Economy
    • World News
    • Privacy Policy
    • Disclaimer
    • Terms and Conditions
    • About us
    • Contact us
    Copyright © 2024 Primeusnews.com All Rights Reserved.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.