COMMENT #1: Marty, they’re beginning to hearken to you. This decision even mentions the Neocons for the primary time.
Sustain the nice struggle
PH
COMMENT #2: Marty, Fascinating bipartisan Home decision mentioning the neocons and saying no extra. Your message appears to be getting via.
Effectively achieved
We will see.
T
REPLY: Eventually, we’re beginning to hear the fitting phrases. Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.), who’s a libertarian-leaning Republican, got here out to introduce a decision towards U.S. navy intervention overseas, posted on the social media website X on Monday that he would introduce such a decision on Tuesday. He mentioned:
“This isn’t our conflict. But when it had been, Congress should resolve such issues in line with our Structure,” Massie mentioned. “I’m introducing a bipartisan Conflict Powers Decision tomorrow to ban our involvement. I invite all members of Congress to cosponsor this decision.”
Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) additionally mentioned that he would co-lead the decision with Massie and that the decision could be privileged, that means that this designation circumvents the management thereby forcing a full Home vote.
“No conflict in Iran. It’s time for each member to go on file. Are you with the neocons who led us into Iraq or do you stand with the American folks?” Khanna mentioned in a post on X. “I’m proud to co-lead this bipartisan Conflict Powers Decision with Rep. Massie that’s privileged and should obtain a vote.”
Any member who doesn’t assist this ought to be pushed from workplace as a pawn of the military-complex institution that advantages from wars.
