QUESTION: Relating to Choose Hannah Dugan’s indictment, some are saying her defence is just like that of Donald Trump, and that is all political since she says she has absolute immunity. You’re the unbiased authorized supply. One lawyer good friend stated, “Ask Armstrong, and you’ll hear the authorized reality.” So what’s up with this?
GP
ANSWER: This county state decide of Wisconsin was correctly indicted for allegedly obstructing the arrest of a Mexican immigrant by federal US authorities. She has claimed that the fees needs to be dismissed as a result of she’s immune from prosecution for official acts. Her definition of a “authorized act” is that she may kill her partner and declare immunity.
This isn’t even remotely associated to the allegations of Trump commenting on the election as president. That’s inside the scope of his place. What he’s alleged to have performed was not an official act by any stretch of the creativeness. She is an activist decide who disagrees with federal regulation however has no judicial energy to bypass that regulation. She had no jurisdiction over the ICE concern, which is in a federal court docket, not a neighborhood county court docket. If I have been within the grand jury, I’d have indicted her with out query. There isn’t a justification in any respect for her actions, and there’s no declare that that is an official act for which she has immunity.
