Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Trending
    • Nick Jonas Admits He Sometimes Resents His Diabetes Diagnosis
    • Iran defends two-day proposal for peace talks after US rejects conditions
    • Nvidia shares slump amid investigation into CEO Jensen Huang | Technology News
    • Jaguars bolster secondary by acquiring Jessie Bates III from Falcons
    • Russell Brand sentenced to 10 years, 6 months in prison for rape, sexual assault
    • Russia Slashes Military Recruitment Bonuses
    • Lakeridge Boys Soccer Knocks Off Lake Oswego 1-0
    • COP31 opens with leaders under pressure to tackle climate crisis
    Prime US News
    • Home
    • World News
    • Latest News
    • US News
    • Sports
    • Politics
    • Opinions
    • More
      • Tech News
      • Trending News
      • World Economy
    Prime US News
    Home»Tech News»US backs Elon Musk’s bid to overturn €120m EU fine against X
    Tech News

    US backs Elon Musk’s bid to overturn €120m EU fine against X

    Team_Prime US NewsBy Team_Prime US NewsSeptember 25, 2026No Comments3 Mins Read
    Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Reddit Telegram Email
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email


    The US authorities is looking for to hitch Elon Musk’s authorized problem to overturn a €120m (£105m) EU superb towards X over its blue tick badges.

    In December 2025, the European Fee said the platform “deceives customers” by permitting folks to pay for a blue verified verify mark, as a result of it’s not “meaningfully verifying” who’s behind the account.

    However US Assistant Lawyer Basic Brett A. Shumate mentioned on Thursday that the Fee had “inappropriately tried” to broaden its attain to American corporations outdoors its management.

    Musk, who spent tens of millions serving to elect Donald Trump and different Republicans, has beforehand claimed EU tech regulation “inhibits progress” for corporations.

    The US Division of Justice (DOJ) has filed an application, external with the EU’s Basic Court docket in help of Musk’s and X’s makes an attempt to dismiss ​the case.

    It claims that beneath a piece of regulation within the Statute of the Court docket of Justice of the EU, a state could intervene in disputes earlier than the court docket if it “can set up an curiosity in the results of the case to the court docket”.

    The DOJ mentioned the US “has a transparent curiosity” in making certain any Fee resolution was utilized constantly with “how territorial jurisdiction is usually understood in worldwide regulation”.

    It additionally needs to ensure it could not “in any other case prejudice” US-headquartered digital providers that “contribute considerably” to its financial system.

    The European Fee has been contacted for remark.

    Along with its use of blue ticks, EU regulators accused X of failing to offer transparency round its adverts and denying researchers entry to public knowledge.

    Henna Virkkunen, the regulator’s government vice-president for tech sovereignty, mentioned on the time of the superb’s concern it was “holding X liable for undermining customers’ rights and evading accountability”.

    “Deceiving customers with blue checkmarks, obscuring info on adverts and shutting out researchers don’t have any place on-line within the EU,” she mentioned.

    US Secretary of State Marco Rubio and the Federal Communications Fee (FCC) had criticised the EU regulator, accusing it of attacking and censoring US corporations.

    “The European Fee’s superb is not simply an assault on X, it is an assault on all American tech platforms and the American folks by overseas governments,” Rubio wrote in a put up on X.

    “The times of censoring People on-line are over.”

    His remarks have been reposted by Musk, who added “completely”.

    The European Fee denied concentrating on any particular nationality, stating it’s merely defending its digital and democratic requirements to keep up its function as a worldwide benchmark.

    The motion marked the Fee’s first official non-compliance resolution beneath the Digital Companies Act (DSA), certainly one of two necessary rulebooks governing on-line platforms within the EU.

    Nevertheless, the EU can be conducting a number of different investigations into the platform, together with one into its integrated AI assistant Grok over issues it was used to create sexualised photographs of actual folks.



    Source link

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Previous ArticleWhen Did A Military Coup Become Acceptable In America?
    Next Article ‘The blockade is complete’: Locals flee occupied south Ukraine as hunger deepens
    Team_Prime US News
    • Website

    Related Posts

    Tech News

    Jensen Huang: Silicon Valley superstar engulfed by personal scandal

    November 9, 2026
    Tech News

    Vinted and eBay could be included in under-16 social media ban, minister says

    November 8, 2026
    Tech News

    Ocarina of Time review: Does Nintendo’s Zelda remake match its original?

    November 8, 2026
    Add A Comment
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Most Popular

    Suspected ‘large shark’ kills man off Sydney beach

    September 6, 2025

    South Korean military suspends loudspeaker broadcasts aimed at North Korea

    June 11, 2025

    What’s the big deal about AI data centres?

    September 23, 2025
    Our Picks

    Nick Jonas Admits He Sometimes Resents His Diabetes Diagnosis

    November 9, 2026

    Iran defends two-day proposal for peace talks after US rejects conditions

    November 9, 2026

    Nvidia shares slump amid investigation into CEO Jensen Huang | Technology News

    November 9, 2026
    Categories
    • Latest News
    • Opinions
    • Politics
    • Sports
    • Tech News
    • Trending News
    • US News
    • World Economy
    • World News
    • Privacy Policy
    • Disclaimer
    • Terms and Conditions
    • About us
    • Contact us
    Copyright © 2024 Primeusnews.com All Rights Reserved.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.